From: Ludek Finstrle <luf@pzkagis.cz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 02:15:13 +0100
Message-ID: <20051209011513.GA8293@soptik.pzkagis.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200512081911.30002.peter_e@gmx.net>
References: <438B792D.6030802@bnl.gov>
<200512081055.12263.peter_e@gmx.net>
<871x0nr8p0.fsf@meije.emic.fr>
<200512081911.30002.peter_e@gmx.net>
Hello
> > As far as i know, the implementation of bytea and large objects in
> > the database are totally different and I suspect there are good
> > reasons to use either one of them, depending on the actual data and
> > application involved.
>
> There is no real reason to use large objects for anything instead of
> bytea.
There is a reason when you have already written application.
I don't use lo. I'm new in development of psqlODBC and one request
was: lo changed between 7.3 and 7.4
I try to solve it. You can find it in pgsql-odbc archive. It has
same subject.
I'm sorry I didn't read FAQ for psqlODBC earlier.
Regards,
Luf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: luf@pzkagis.cz, peter_e@gmx.net, pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4
In-Reply-To: <20051209011513.GA8293@soptik.pzkagis.cz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox