From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Mount <petermount@maidstone.gov.uk>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: JDBC now needs updates for large objects
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 21:57:47 -0400
Message-ID: <26093.972352667@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
Peter,
As of current sources, large objects no longer occupy tables named
'xinvNNNN' nor indexes named 'xinxNNNN'. Therefore, it'd be appropriate
to remove the special tests that exclude tables/indices named that way
from the tests in DatabaseMetaData.java. I have not done this because
I'm not in a position to test changes to the JDBC driver; would you
please add it to your todo list?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, petermount@maidstone.gov.uk, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: JDBC now needs updates for large objects
In-Reply-To: <26093.972352667@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox