pg.ddx.io  pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hartwig <daveh@insightdist.com>
To: Thomas G. Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 09:42:38 -0400
Message-ID: <35A4C8CE.3A7A43BC@insightdist.com> (raw)
References: <35A133DB.CFE63868@insightdist.com>
	<17439.980708@bo.nettuno.it>
	<35A397BC.227963C7@insightdist.com>
	<35A44BC2.2BD59A30@alumni.caltech.edu>

Tom,

Yes, I do have access to the cvs tree from home.   And, I will check it out
when I get home.

I am curious though.   Did you apply the patch, mentioned below, to your
latest 6.4 tree?    This patch should have been already part of the latest
6.4.   And, to my knowledge, it was already applied completely and
successfully.

Anyway,  the intent of the patch on our web site was to allow 6.3 users to
be able to use MS Access cleanly.   Now that I think of it, though, this
version of the patch does not include the new "output" and "sql"  files
necessary for the regression test.   In any case, I should clean that up.


Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

> > http://www.insightdist.com/psqlodbc/junkfilter_patch.txt
> > I know the code works.
>
> Hi David. Do you have access to the latest cvs development tree for
> Postgres? I'm seeing backend crashes from the "junkfilter" regression
> test, and have been for some time. I (just this morning) applied some
> patches to the tree to fix up type coersion for inserts from other
> tables or columns, and this changed code in the "junkfilter" area.
> However, the regression test behavior is still bad.
>
> If you have access to the latest tree, and had time to look at this it
> would be great. Otherwise, I'll start poking at it. Talk to you soon...
>
>                    - Tom






view thread (8+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <35A4C8CE.3A7A43BC@insightdist.com>
Permalink:  ../35A4C8CE.3A7A43BC@insightdist.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/35A4C8CE.3A7A43BC@insightdist.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
  Cc: daveh@insightdist.com, lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu, hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres
  In-Reply-To: <35A4C8CE.3A7A43BC@insightdist.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox