pg.ddx.io pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
12+ messages / 5 participants
[nested] [flat]
* ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
@ 2000-02-03 13:15 Jaume Pausas <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jaume Pausas @ 2000-02-03 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-interfaces
Hi
I´ve been reading a short course about jdbc 2.0 and there put that some
drivers includes implementation of the ConnectionPoolDataSource
interface. Does postgresql driver include it?
Anybody have an implementation of a spooled database?
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
@ 2000-02-03 14:14 Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
2000-02-04 18:38 ` Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Joe Shevland <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Peter Mount @ 2000-02-03 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Jaume Pausas' <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>; pgsql-interfaces
If you mean the javax.sql standard extensions, they are in the 7.0
release.
ie: I'm currently merging the supplied sources into the cvs source at
the moment.
Peter
--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jaume Pausas [mailto:a1649@dis.ulpgc.es]
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 1:16 PM
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
Hi
I´ve been reading a short course about jdbc 2.0 and there put that some
drivers includes implementation of the ConnectionPoolDataSource
interface. Does postgresql driver include it?
Anybody have an implementation of a spooled database?
************
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
2000-02-03 14:14 RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
@ 2000-02-04 18:38 ` Joe Shevland <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
2000-02-03 23:55 ` Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Assaf Arkin <arkin@exoffice.com>
2000-02-04 02:39 ` Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Joseph Shraibman <jks@p1.selectacast.net>
2000-02-04 19:05 ` Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Joe Shevland <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
0 siblings, 3 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joe Shevland @ 2000-02-04 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>; 'Jaume Pausas' <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>; pgsql-interfaces
Oi oi! Is 7.0 close and whats in the beast?
Thanks,
Joe
--
Any views stated are in the hope that Peter Mount
moves quickly on the PostgreSQL JDBC driver ;)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Mount" <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
To: "'Jaume Pausas'" <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>; <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 6:14 AM
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
> If you mean the javax.sql standard extensions, they are in the 7.0
> release.
>
> ie: I'm currently merging the supplied sources into the cvs source at
> the moment.
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Mount
> Enterprise Support
> Maidstone Borough Council
> Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaume Pausas [mailto:a1649@dis.ulpgc.es]
> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 1:16 PM
> To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
> Subject: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
>
>
> Hi
>
> I´ve been reading a short course about jdbc 2.0 and there put that some
> drivers includes implementation of the ConnectionPoolDataSource
> interface. Does postgresql driver include it?
>
> Anybody have an implementation of a spooled database?
>
>
>
> ************
>
> ************
>
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
2000-02-03 14:14 RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
2000-02-04 18:38 ` Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Joe Shevland <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
@ 2000-02-03 23:55 ` Assaf Arkin <arkin@exoffice.com>
2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Assaf Arkin @ 2000-02-03 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joe Shevland <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>; +Cc: Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>; 'Jaume Pausas' <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>; pgsql-interfaces
> > Anybody have an implementation of a spooled database?
Spooled?
arkin
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Assaf Arkin www.exoffice.com
CTO, Exoffice Technologies, Inc. www.exolab.org
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
2000-02-03 14:14 RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
2000-02-04 18:38 ` Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Joe Shevland <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
@ 2000-02-04 02:39 ` Joseph Shraibman <jks@p1.selectacast.net>
2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Shraibman @ 2000-02-04 02:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-interfaces
Joe Shevland wrote:
> Oi oi! Is 7.0 close and whats in the beast?
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
Read the newsgroup muc.lists.postgres.hackers to get an idea. One thing I am
disappointed in is that big tuples seem to have been dropped from the 7.0
release. See http://www.postgresql.org/projects/devel-toast.html for the
progress on that project.
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
2000-02-03 14:14 RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
2000-02-04 18:38 ` Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Joe Shevland <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
@ 2000-02-04 19:05 ` Joe Shevland <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joe Shevland @ 2000-02-04 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>; 'Jaume Pausas' <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>; pgsql-interfaces
Hi,
Whats the status/go with stream support for JDBC?
My questions are will the backend allow
it (using JDBC, not native) and would it
be too hard to point the stream support
at the large object API?
i.e. anything that's a setBinaryStream()
or whatnot just serializes the object.
Also, whats involved with getting a
LO reaping mechanism permanently in place?
I'm doing some stuff with Java objects
at the moment and LO reaping and the
stream support strike me as pretty
necessary.
Cheers,
Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Shevland" <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
To: "Peter Mount" <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>; "'Jaume Pausas'" <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>; <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
> Oi oi! Is 7.0 close and whats in the beast?
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
> --
> Any views stated are in the hope that Peter Mount
> moves quickly on the PostgreSQL JDBC driver ;)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Mount" <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
> To: "'Jaume Pausas'" <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>; <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 6:14 AM
> Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
>
>
> > If you mean the javax.sql standard extensions, they are in the 7.0
> > release.
> >
> > ie: I'm currently merging the supplied sources into the cvs source at
> > the moment.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > --
> > Peter Mount
> > Enterprise Support
> > Maidstone Borough Council
> > Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jaume Pausas [mailto:a1649@dis.ulpgc.es]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 1:16 PM
> > To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
> > Subject: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
> >
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I´ve been reading a short course about jdbc 2.0 and there put that some
> > drivers includes implementation of the ConnectionPoolDataSource
> > interface. Does postgresql driver include it?
> >
> > Anybody have an implementation of a spooled database?
> >
> >
> >
> > ************
> >
> > ************
> >
>
>
> ************
>
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
@ 2000-02-04 12:51 Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
2000-02-05 08:03 ` Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Joe Shevland <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
2000-02-07 21:30 ` Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Assaf Arkin <arkin@exoffice.com>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Peter Mount @ 2000-02-04 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Joe Shevland' <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>; Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>; 'Jaume Pausas' <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>; pgsql-interfaces
New in the 7.0 driver:
* javax.sql support (thanks arkin)
* Transaction Isolation (should have been in 6.5.3, but got missed)
* dutch translation of errors
* Array support
* The driver is now under the package org.postgresql not postgresql
* Rewrote the Makefile
These will be done by the end of this weekend:
* LOCATOR()'s (required for BLOB & CLOB)
* java.sql.BLOB & java.sql.CLOB support
* The way our type extensions will support the standard way introduced
in JDBC2.0
* Copy support (finally)
* InputStream & OutputStream support for Large Objects
* Translations of error messages for some other languages (using
babelfish)
* New ImageViewer example
* Rewritten blob example
And possible if I get chance before 7.0 is released (in order of
priority):
* StarOffice support (both Linux & Windog)
* Implement the JAVA_OBJECT data type
* Implement Structure support
* CallableStatement
* ResultSet to use a cursor when retrieving results
These won't be done until after 7.0:
* RowSet's
* Updateable ResultSet's (not sure how to do this yet)
Peter
--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Shevland [mailto:shevlandj@kpi.com.au]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 6:39 PM
To: Peter Mount; 'Jaume Pausas'; pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
Oi oi! Is 7.0 close and whats in the beast?
Thanks,
Joe
--
Any views stated are in the hope that Peter Mount
moves quickly on the PostgreSQL JDBC driver ;)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Mount" <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
To: "'Jaume Pausas'" <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>;
<pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 6:14 AM
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
> If you mean the javax.sql standard extensions, they are in the 7.0
> release.
>
> ie: I'm currently merging the supplied sources into the cvs source at
> the moment.
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Mount
> Enterprise Support
> Maidstone Borough Council
> Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough
Council.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaume Pausas [mailto:a1649@dis.ulpgc.es]
> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 1:16 PM
> To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
> Subject: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
>
>
> Hi
>
> I´ve been reading a short course about jdbc 2.0 and there put that
some
> drivers includes implementation of the ConnectionPoolDataSource
> interface. Does postgresql driver include it?
>
> Anybody have an implementation of a spooled database?
>
>
>
> ************
>
> ************
>
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
2000-02-04 12:51 RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
@ 2000-02-05 08:03 ` Joe Shevland <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joe Shevland @ 2000-02-05 08:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>; 'Jaume Pausas' <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>; pgsql-interfaces
That sounds awesome!
Thanks for all the good work.
Regards,
Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Mount" <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
To: "'Joe Shevland'" <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>; "Peter Mount" <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>; "'Jaume Pausas'" <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>;
<pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 4:51 AM
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
> New in the 7.0 driver:
> * javax.sql support (thanks arkin)
> * Transaction Isolation (should have been in 6.5.3, but got missed)
> * dutch translation of errors
> * Array support
> * The driver is now under the package org.postgresql not postgresql
> * Rewrote the Makefile
>
> These will be done by the end of this weekend:
> * LOCATOR()'s (required for BLOB & CLOB)
> * java.sql.BLOB & java.sql.CLOB support
> * The way our type extensions will support the standard way introduced
> in JDBC2.0
> * Copy support (finally)
> * InputStream & OutputStream support for Large Objects
> * Translations of error messages for some other languages (using
> babelfish)
> * New ImageViewer example
> * Rewritten blob example
>
> And possible if I get chance before 7.0 is released (in order of
> priority):
> * StarOffice support (both Linux & Windog)
> * Implement the JAVA_OBJECT data type
> * Implement Structure support
> * CallableStatement
> * ResultSet to use a cursor when retrieving results
>
> These won't be done until after 7.0:
> * RowSet's
> * Updateable ResultSet's (not sure how to do this yet)
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Mount
> Enterprise Support
> Maidstone Borough Council
> Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Shevland [mailto:shevlandj@kpi.com.au]
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 6:39 PM
> To: Peter Mount; 'Jaume Pausas'; pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
>
>
> Oi oi! Is 7.0 close and whats in the beast?
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
> --
> Any views stated are in the hope that Peter Mount
> moves quickly on the PostgreSQL JDBC driver ;)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Mount" <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
> To: "'Jaume Pausas'" <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>;
> <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 6:14 AM
> Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
>
>
> > If you mean the javax.sql standard extensions, they are in the 7.0
> > release.
> >
> > ie: I'm currently merging the supplied sources into the cvs source at
> > the moment.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > --
> > Peter Mount
> > Enterprise Support
> > Maidstone Borough Council
> > Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough
> Council.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jaume Pausas [mailto:a1649@dis.ulpgc.es]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 1:16 PM
> > To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
> > Subject: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
> >
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I´ve been reading a short course about jdbc 2.0 and there put that
> some
> > drivers includes implementation of the ConnectionPoolDataSource
> > interface. Does postgresql driver include it?
> >
> > Anybody have an implementation of a spooled database?
> >
> >
> >
> > ************
> >
> > ************
> >
>
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
2000-02-04 12:51 RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
@ 2000-02-07 21:30 ` Assaf Arkin <arkin@exoffice.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Assaf Arkin @ 2000-02-07 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>; +Cc: 'Joe Shevland' <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>; 'Jaume Pausas' <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>; pgsql-interfaces
Peter Mount wrote:
>
> New in the 7.0 driver:
> * javax.sql support (thanks arkin)
Thank you. I want to point out that the Oracle JDBC drivers do not seem
to support javax.sql yet. Nice to see Postgresql getting ahead of the
curve :-)
Are there any plans to support X/Open error code reporting? Rather than
just reporting the message, the X/Open error code will be reported
allowing the application to determine from the SQLException what went
wrong. This allows the application to determine duplicate keys, aborted
transactions, etc.
> * ResultSet to use a cursor when retrieving results
Which type of cursors will be supported?
arkin
> These won't be done until after 7.0:
> * RowSet's
> * Updateable ResultSet's (not sure how to do this yet)
>
> Peter
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Assaf Arkin www.exoffice.com
CTO, Exoffice Technologies, Inc. www.exolab.org
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
@ 2000-02-08 09:07 Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
2000-02-09 04:19 ` Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Assaf Arkin <arkin@exoffice.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Peter Mount @ 2000-02-08 09:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Assaf Arkin' <arkin@exoffice.com>; +Cc: pgsql-interfaces
As usual when replying from here, replies prefixed with PM:
--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
-----Original Message-----
From: Assaf Arkin [mailto:arkin@exoffice.com]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 9:31 PM
To: Peter Mount
Cc: 'Joe Shevland'; 'Jaume Pausas'; pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
Peter Mount wrote:
>
> New in the 7.0 driver:
> * javax.sql support (thanks arkin)
Thank you. I want to point out that the Oracle JDBC drivers do not seem
to support javax.sql yet. Nice to see Postgresql getting ahead of the
curve :-)
PM: It is good to see were ahead of them...
Are there any plans to support X/Open error code reporting? Rather than
just reporting the message, the X/Open error code will be reported
allowing the application to determine from the SQLException what went
wrong. This allows the application to determine duplicate keys, aborted
transactions, etc.
PM: It should be relatively easy. All of our SQLException's are now
keyworded to allow the internationalization of the messages, so in
theory we can add the code by way of a lookup on that keyword.
> * ResultSet to use a cursor when retrieving results
Which type of cursors will be supported?
PM: Not sure yet. I'm currently about 3 days behind (from the point
where I wanted to be by today).
arkin
> These won't be done until after 7.0:
> * RowSet's
> * Updateable ResultSet's (not sure how to do this yet)
>
> Peter
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Assaf Arkin www.exoffice.com
CTO, Exoffice Technologies, Inc. www.exolab.org
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
2000-02-08 09:07 RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
@ 2000-02-09 04:19 ` Assaf Arkin <arkin@exoffice.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Assaf Arkin @ 2000-02-09 04:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>; +Cc: pgsql-interfaces
Peter Mount wrote:
>
> As usual when replying from here, replies prefixed with PM:
>
> --
> Peter Mount
> Enterprise Support
> Maidstone Borough Council
> Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
> PM: It should be relatively easy. All of our SQLException's are now
> keyworded to allow the internationalization of the messages, so in
> theory we can add the code by way of a lookup on that keyword.
Hmm If the back-end starts sending a different message, it will break
the driver. Kind of hard to keep track of.
> > * ResultSet to use a cursor when retrieving results
>
> Which type of cursors will be supported?
>
> PM: Not sure yet. I'm currently about 3 days behind (from the point
> where I wanted to be by today).
Can the back-end support forward/backward scrolling?
arkin
>
> arkin
>
> > These won't be done until after 7.0:
> > * RowSet's
> > * Updateable ResultSet's (not sure how to do this yet)
> >
> > Peter
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Assaf Arkin www.exoffice.com
> CTO, Exoffice Technologies, Inc. www.exolab.org
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Assaf Arkin www.exoffice.com
CTO, Exoffice Technologies, Inc. www.exolab.org
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
@ 2000-02-10 08:49 Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Peter Mount @ 2000-02-10 08:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Assaf Arkin' <arkin@exoffice.com>; Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>; +Cc: pgsql-interfaces
As usual when replying from here, replies prefixed with PM:
--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
-----Original Message-----
From: Assaf Arkin [mailto:arkin@exoffice.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2000 4:20 AM
To: Peter Mount
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
Peter Mount wrote:
>
> As usual when replying from here, replies prefixed with PM:
>
> --
> Peter Mount
> Enterprise Support
> Maidstone Borough Council
> Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough
Council.
> PM: It should be relatively easy. All of our SQLException's are now
> keyworded to allow the internationalization of the messages, so in
> theory we can add the code by way of a lookup on that keyword.
Hmm If the back-end starts sending a different message, it will break
the driver. Kind of hard to keep track of.
PM: Yes, this has always been the case, and I'd think that most if not
all of the interfaces suffer from this problem. The internal to the
driver messages would be easy, but the backend ones would need to be
monitored to prevent this problem.
> > * ResultSet to use a cursor when retrieving results
>
> Which type of cursors will be supported?
>
> PM: Not sure yet. I'm currently about 3 days behind (from the point
> where I wanted to be by today).
Can the back-end support forward/backward scrolling?
PM: AFAIK it does.
arkin
>
> arkin
>
> > These won't be done until after 7.0:
> > * RowSet's
> > * Updateable ResultSet's (not sure how to do this yet)
> >
> > Peter
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Assaf Arkin www.exoffice.com
> CTO, Exoffice Technologies, Inc. www.exolab.org
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Assaf Arkin www.exoffice.com
CTO, Exoffice Technologies, Inc. www.exolab.org
************
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-02-10 08:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-02-03 13:15 ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Jaume Pausas <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>
2000-02-03 14:14 RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
2000-02-04 18:38 ` Joe Shevland <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
2000-02-03 23:55 ` Assaf Arkin <arkin@exoffice.com>
2000-02-04 02:39 ` Joseph Shraibman <jks@p1.selectacast.net>
2000-02-04 19:05 ` Joe Shevland <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
2000-02-04 12:51 RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
2000-02-05 08:03 ` Joe Shevland <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
2000-02-07 21:30 ` Assaf Arkin <arkin@exoffice.com>
2000-02-08 09:07 RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
2000-02-09 04:19 ` Assaf Arkin <arkin@exoffice.com>
2000-02-10 08:49 RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC) Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox