From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Cc: Peter Mount (Home) <peter@retep.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 11:15:46 +0000
Message-ID: <390EB8E2.6EE3D2DA@alumni.caltech.edu> (raw)
References: <200005021102.HAA08318@candle.pha.pa.us>
> Not to bug you Peter, but 7.0 may not wait three days before release.
I would vote that this is important enough that it should wait, but no
one has raised the issue until now so we haven't discussed it. The
docs may or may not be completed within the next day (still jet-lagged
from vacation, but waking up at 3am does leave some extra time in the
morning, eh?), and if they stretch an extra day which is certainly
possible then we are only talking about an extra day for this. No big
deal in the grand scheme of things...
Peter, is there some testing that could/should be done with the new
driver (by others) in the meantime, or is it pretty likely to be
reasonably hashed out?
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk, lamar.owen@wgcr.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, peter@retep.org.uk
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
In-Reply-To: <390EB8E2.6EE3D2DA@alumni.caltech.edu>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox