From: Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net>
To: Gunnar R|nning <gunnar@candleweb.no>
Cc: Janossy Gergely <gjano@freemail.hu>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: jdbc driver: Why it isn't jdbcCompliant?
Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 22:36:16 -0400
Message-ID: <39332920.4C9BC95B@selectacast.net> (raw)
References: <00052701341103.02227@azul>
<x6snv3ot1g.fsf@thor.candleweb.no>
<3932BC0A.482A765B@selectacast.net>
<x61z2lx7nh.fsf@thor.candleweb.no>
I wasn't making a point. I was just including the comment from the
source code to tell why jdbcCompliant() returns false, namely that
postgresql isn't sql 92 compliant.
Gunnar R|nning wrote:
>
> Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net> writes:
>
> Yes - your point being ? I think that you will find that most JDBC drivers
> out there do not implement the spec. to the letter. But using good OO
> design principles and adapters you can easily use a subset of the spec(plus
> your favorite non SQL 92 database extensions) together with appropriate
> adaptors to keep things fairly easy to port between databases. The four
> databases that I know best Sybase ASE, PosgreSQL, Progress V9.1 and MySQL
> do not fully implement the JDBC spec. But then again I think SQL 92 is the
> same story...
>
> Regards,
>
> Gunnar
>
> > >From the Driver source code:
>
> > public boolean jdbcCompliant()
> > {
> > return false;
> > }
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: jks@selectacast.net, gunnar@candleweb.no, gjano@freemail.hu
Subject: Re: jdbc driver: Why it isn't jdbcCompliant?
In-Reply-To: <39332920.4C9BC95B@selectacast.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox