pg.ddx.io  pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ed Loehr <eloehr@austin.rr.com>
To: pggeneral <pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: RFC:  User reviews of PostgreSQL RI functionality
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 12:00:35 -0600
Message-ID: <3A27E743.323691B5@austin.rr.com> (raw)

How well is the recently-added PostgreSQL functionality supporting
referential integrity (RI) working.  Any serious bugs?  Any major
hinderances?  Other impressions?

I'd be particularly interested in hearing from people who've implemented
larger schemas using RI (say, more than 30 tables and 50 foreign keys).

Regards,
Ed Loehr



view thread (3+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <3A27E743.323691B5@austin.rr.com>
Permalink:  ../3A27E743.323691B5@austin.rr.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/3A27E743.323691B5@austin.rr.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
  Cc: eloehr@austin.rr.com, pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org
  Subject: Re: RFC:  User reviews of PostgreSQL RI functionality
  In-Reply-To: <3A27E743.323691B5@austin.rr.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox