From: Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: PostgreSQL jdbc list <pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 17:25:44 -0500
Message-ID: <3A6F5668.3C7443F7@selectacast.net> (raw)
References: <200101241418.JAA14935@candle.pha.pa.us>
<3A6F4FA6.38864C90@selectacast.net>
Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>
> No, it cannot be static.
>
Well actually there could be static variables, but they could not be
used directly. It might pay just to keep them around to clone() so we
don't have to reconstruct them for every method that uses them. But the
performance gain would be minimal and would add a bit of confusion to
the code, so I don't suggest it.
--
Joseph Shraibman
jks@selectacast.net
Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: jks@selectacast.net, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems
In-Reply-To: <3A6F5668.3C7443F7@selectacast.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox