From: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih@Norway.EU.net>
To: Maarten Boekhold <boekhold@tibco.com>
Cc: Steven Bradley <sbradley@llnl.gov>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Performance
Date: 24 Jun 1999 10:08:03 +0200
Message-ID: <86d7ym81i4.fsf@athene.i.eunet.no> (raw)
References: <3.0.5.32.19990623150509.0092e990@poptop.llnl.gov>
<86g13i86cz.fsf@athene.i.eunet.no>
<3771E013.E64518BA@tibco.com>
Maarten Boekhold <boekhold@tibco.com> writes:
> This makes a difference, since a lot of processing is done on commit
> time. The second variant might thus be misleading.
Yup, but I did include the time to commit in the measurement. In fact,
I used the time(1) command to time the whole run of the client program.
-tih
--
Popularity is the hallmark of mediocrity. --Niles Crane, "Frasier"
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: tih@Norway.EU.net, boekhold@tibco.com, sbradley@llnl.gov
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Performance
In-Reply-To: <86d7ym81i4.fsf@athene.i.eunet.no>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox