From: Aleksey Demakov <avd@gcom.ru>
To: Sergio <ser@perio.unlp.edu.ar>
Cc: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] yet another postgresql interface
Date: 13 Jan 1999 14:01:32 +0600
Message-ID: <87r9szob37.fsf@avd.gcom.ru> (raw)
References: <SAK.1.1.1999.cjpjcgod@speedy.perio.unlp.edu.ar>
Sergio <ser@perio.unlp.edu.ar> writes:
> >I dubbed it pguile.
>
> what about libpqguile ?,
> so we have libpq, libpq++, libpqguile, libpq*
>
> IMO pguile is too generic.
Hmm... Probably, you are right. The name pguile is bad.
I'll change it to guile-pgsql. Most guile extensions are
called this way (guile-gtk, guile-tcltk, guile-hobbit).
--
Aleksey Demakov
avd@gcom.ru
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: avd@gcom.ru, ser@perio.unlp.edu.ar, lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] yet another postgresql interface
In-Reply-To: <87r9szob37.fsf@avd.gcom.ru>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox