From: eem21@cam.ac.uk
To: scrappy@hub.org
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] libpq + multiple connections ...
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 21:29:56 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <E11sYLC-0004kM-00@orange.csi.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9911291724230.69193-100000@thelab.hub.org>
On 29 Nov, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 1999 eem21@cam.ac.uk wrote:
>
>> On 29 Nov, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>> >
>> > Is this something that could *safely* be back-patched to a v6.5.4 release?
>>
>> Well, it's not _supposed_ to have changed the behaviour for existing
>> functions. However, there's been quite a lot of chopping and changing,
>> and I might have lost something somewhere. That said, it would be of
>> great help to me if it made it into a 6.5.x release, and I would thus
>> be willing to test it. I can only test ix86/Linux, unfortunately.
>> When would it be released, if that were the case?
>
> If you can get a patch in so that we can test it
I'm doin' it, I'm doin' it... ;-)
> would love to get a release out by ... oh ... end of week? :)
>
> Anyone object overly?
Nope.
> [Snip async functions]
Ewan.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: eem21@cam.ac.uk, scrappy@hub.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] libpq + multiple connections ...
In-Reply-To: <E11sYLC-0004kM-00@orange.csi.cam.ac.uk>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox