From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] libpq events patch (with sgml docs)
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:42:06 -0400
Message-ID: <27615.1221619326@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48C19759.90402@esilo.com>
References: <48C18533.2000204@esilo.com>
<20080905192215.GK4353@alvh.no-ip.org>
<48C18B48.509@esilo.com>
<20080905194853.GL4353@alvh.no-ip.org>
<48C191A7.3000205@esilo.com>
<20080905201504.GM4353@alvh.no-ip.org>
<48C19759.90402@esilo.com>
Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com> writes:
> Missed that one. Good catch :) Update attached.
Looking at this now. Question: why does PQgetResult invoke the
RESULTCREATE event only for non-error results? This seems a rather
odd asymmetry, particularly in view of the fact that a RESULTDESTROY
event will occur for error results. And surely we do not need to
micro-optimize error cases for speed.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, ac@esilo.com, alvherre@commandprompt.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, mmoncure@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] libpq events patch (with sgml docs)
In-Reply-To: <27615.1221619326@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox