From: Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@sun.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: page macros cleanup
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 14:33:41 +0530
Message-ID: <2e78013d0807040203m268ae3a7kdbe65a9695aa7365@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <486DE16C.3070705@sun.com>
References: <48529B83.9010907@sun.com>
<486CDC83.7060609@enterprisedb.com>
<486DE16C.3070705@sun.com>
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@sun.com> wrote:
> Patch
> modifies HashMaxItemSize. It should require reindex on all hash indexes.
> Should we bump catalog version?
>
Do we really need that ? Even if the new HashMaxItemSize comes out to
be lower than the current limit (because of MAXALIGN), I don't see how
existing hash indexes can have a larger item than the new limit.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Cc: pavan.deolasee@gmail.com, Zdenek.Kotala@sun.com, heikki@enterprisedb.com
Subject: Re: page macros cleanup
In-Reply-To: <2e78013d0807040203m268ae3a7kdbe65a9695aa7365@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox