From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:58:17 +0400
Message-ID: <487220F9.4010403@sigaev.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080707134533.GB21091@alvh.no-ip.org>
References: <483FD205.4090904@sigaev.ru>
<486BC501.6060605@sigaev.ru>
<20080707134533.GB21091@alvh.no-ip.org>
> I looked this over and it looks good in general. I was only wondering
> about for single-column indexes -- we're storing attribute numbers too,
> right?
No, GinState->oneCol field signals to GinFormTuple and
gin_index_getattr/gintuple_get_attrnum about actual storage.
Single column index is binary compatible with current index :)
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Cc: teodor@sigaev.ru, alvherre@commandprompt.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
In-Reply-To: <487220F9.4010403@sigaev.ru>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox