From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jim C. Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Cc: H.J. Sanders <hjs@rmax.nl>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:44:20 -0400
Message-ID: <10362.1160664260@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061012135248.GS28647@nasby.net>
References: <GMEAJIDMNDKCIHMMHDFLEEOHEGAA.hjs@rmax.nl>
<452E11FB.7070704@paradise.net.nz>
<20061012135248.GS28647@nasby.net>
"Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net> writes:
> If someone's going to commit to putting effort into improving the
> planner then that's wonderful. But I can't recall any significant
> planner improvements since min/max (which I'd argue was more of a bug
> fix than an improvement).
Hmph. Apparently I've wasted most of the last five years.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, jim@nasby.net, markir@paradise.net.nz, hjs@rmax.nl
Subject: Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?
In-Reply-To: <10362.1160664260@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox