From: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
To: Jim C. Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: H.J. Sanders <hjs@rmax.nl>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:26:34 +1300
Message-ID: <452EC11A.2030703@paradise.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061012163747.GG28647@nasby.net>
References: <GMEAJIDMNDKCIHMMHDFLEEOHEGAA.hjs@rmax.nl>
<452E11FB.7070704@paradise.net.nz>
<20061012135248.GS28647@nasby.net>
<10362.1160664260@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20061012163747.GG28647@nasby.net>
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
> Ok, now that I've actually looked at the release notes, I take that back
> and apologize. But while there's a lot of improvements that have been
> made, there's still some seriously tough problems that have been talked
> about for a long time and there's still no "light at the end of the
> tunnel", like how to handle multi-column statistics.
Yeah - multi-column stats and cost/stats for functions look the the next
feature additions we need to get going on....
Cheers
Mark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: markir@paradise.net.nz, jim@nasby.net, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, hjs@rmax.nl
Subject: Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?
In-Reply-To: <452EC11A.2030703@paradise.net.nz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox