From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Ron Peacetree <rjpeace@earthlink.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 12:24:54 +0100
Message-ID: <1128425094.8603.296.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051004100441.GC17589@svana.org>
References: <18329659.1128188552696.JavaMail.root@elwamui-polski.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
<20051001215602.GG13830@svana.org>
<29837.1128223567@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20051002123240.GA30492@svana.org>
<20051002193835.GJ30492@svana.org>
<1128376292.8603.142.camel@localhost.localdomain>
<20051004100441.GC17589@svana.org>
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 12:04 +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 10:51:32PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > Basically, I recommend adding "-Winline -finline-limit-1500" to the
> > > default build while we discuss other options.
> >
> > I add -Winline but get no warnings. Why would I use -finline-limit-1500?
> >
> > I'm interested, but uncertain as to what difference this makes. Surely
> > using -O3 works fine?
How did you determine the 1500 figure? Can you give some more info to
surround that recommendation to allow everybody to evaluate it?
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: simon@2ndquadrant.com, kleptog@svana.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, rjpeace@earthlink.net, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
In-Reply-To: <1128425094.8603.296.camel@localhost.localdomain>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox