From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Which benchmark to use for testing FS?
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:05:05 -0700
Message-ID: <1156435505.15743.171.camel@dogma.v10.wvs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060824015054.GE2900@mathom.us>
References: <1156371783.15743.157.camel@dogma.v10.wvs>
<20060824015054.GE2900@mathom.us>
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 21:50 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 03:23:03PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> >Also, do ext2 or UFS without soft updates run the risk of losing or
> >corrupting my data?
>
> I suggest you check the list archives; there's a lot of stuff about
> filesystems and disk configuration in there.
>
I spent a while looking in the list archives, but the list archives have
been misbehaving lately (you click on a search result and the message
that appears doesn't have the same subject as the one you clicked on).
They may have fixed that (they are aware of the problem, according to
pgsql-www). Also, the messages I was able to find were mostly from a
long time ago.
If you have a pointer to a particularly useful thread please let me
know.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql@j-davis.com, mstone+postgres@mathom.us
Subject: Re: Which benchmark to use for testing FS?
In-Reply-To: <1156435505.15743.171.camel@dogma.v10.wvs>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox