From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Which benchmark to use for testing FS?
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:50:56 -0400
Message-ID: <20060824015054.GE2900@mathom.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1156371783.15743.157.camel@dogma.v10.wvs>
References: <1156371783.15743.157.camel@dogma.v10.wvs>
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 03:23:03PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
>Also, do ext2 or UFS without soft updates run the risk of losing or
>corrupting my data?
I suggest you check the list archives; there's a lot of stuff about
filesystems and disk configuration in there.
Mike Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mstone+postgres@mathom.us
Subject: Re: Which benchmark to use for testing FS?
In-Reply-To: <20060824015054.GE2900@mathom.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox