From: Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@kostyrka.org>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: partitioned table performance
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:58:15 +0100
Message-ID: <1162245495.8515.7.camel@andi-lap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1162196302.11568.221.camel@silverbirch.site>
References: <1162074485.16385.93.camel@andi-lap>
<1162196302.11568.221.camel@silverbirch.site>
Am Montag, den 30.10.2006, 08:18 +0000 schrieb Simon Riggs:
> On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 00:28 +0200, Andreas Kostyrka wrote:
>
> > Any ideas how to make the optimizer handle partitioned tables more
> > sensible?
>
> Yes, those are known inefficiencies in the current implementation which
> we expect to address for 8.3.
Any ideas to force the current optimizer to do something sensible?
Andreas
>
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 188B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: andreas@kostyrka.org, simon@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: partitioned table performance
In-Reply-To: <1162245495.8515.7.camel@andi-lap>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox