From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@kostyrka.org>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: partitioned table performance
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:46:43 +0000
Message-ID: <1162248403.11568.370.camel@silverbirch.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1162245495.8515.7.camel@andi-lap>
References: <1162074485.16385.93.camel@andi-lap>
<1162196302.11568.221.camel@silverbirch.site>
<1162245495.8515.7.camel@andi-lap>
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 22:58 +0100, Andreas Kostyrka wrote:
> Am Montag, den 30.10.2006, 08:18 +0000 schrieb Simon Riggs:
> > On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 00:28 +0200, Andreas Kostyrka wrote:
> >
> > > Any ideas how to make the optimizer handle partitioned tables more
> > > sensible?
> >
> > Yes, those are known inefficiencies in the current implementation which
> > we expect to address for 8.3.
>
> Any ideas to force the current optimizer to do something sensible?
Brute force & ignorance: PL/pgSQL
Perhaps some other domain knowledge might help you shorten the search?
Thats all for now. It's not a minor fixup and nobody had time to fix
that for 8.2 since other fish were bigger.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: simon@2ndquadrant.com, andreas@kostyrka.org
Subject: Re: partitioned table performance
In-Reply-To: <1162248403.11568.370.camel@silverbirch.site>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox