pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Isabella Ghiurea <isabella.ghiurea@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: PG 9.5 2 tables same DDL with diff size
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:48:16 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <1515599296900-0.post@n3.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BL2PR17MB0897AB4A9B93B23BE1921F09DA110@BL2PR17MB0897.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20b07dd9-ab4e-5d48-6fbd-66e1d9161524@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>
	<BL2PR17MB0897AB4A9B93B23BE1921F09DA110@BL2PR17MB0897.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>

I run full vacuum and reindex on largest table (50GB) while there was no
server activities  so I assume no transaction was holding a lock on table
since the full vacuum was able to run, anything where I should consider
looking ?



--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-performance-f2050081.html




view thread (5+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1515599296900-0.post@n3.nabble.com>
Permalink:  ../1515599296900-0.post@n3.nabble.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1515599296900-0.post@n3.nabble.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: isabella.ghiurea@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
  Subject: RE: PG 9.5 2 tables same DDL with diff size
  In-Reply-To: <1515599296900-0.post@n3.nabble.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox