From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: Matthew Schumacher <matt.s@aptalaska.net>
Subject: Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Bayes module.
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:12:15 -0700
Message-ID: <200507271712.15299.josh@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42E80C28.2040608@aptalaska.net>
References: <42E80C28.2040608@aptalaska.net>
Matt,
> After playing with various indexes and what not I simply am unable to
> make this procedure perform any better. Perhaps someone on the list can
> spot the bottleneck and reveal why this procedure isn't performing that
> well or ways to make it better.
Well, my first thought is that this is a pretty complicated procedure for
something you want to peform well. Is all this logic really necessary?
How does it get done for MySQL?
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, matt.s@aptalaska.net
Subject: Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Bayes module.
In-Reply-To: <200507271712.15299.josh@agliodbs.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox