pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Alex Hayward <xelah-pgsql@xelah.com>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Cc: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
Cc: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adaptec
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 06:34:17 -0600
Message-ID: <20060321123417.GW15742@pervasive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0603211217420.27598@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com>
References: <20060317221116.GA14661@juniper.net>
	<8F6490E1-64E2-406B-A559-7DA8BA1EB197@khera.org>
	<20060321103219.GD15742@pervasive.com>
	<441FDD7E.7050106@paradise.net.nz>
	<20060321114658.GK15742@pervasive.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0603211217420.27598@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com>

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 12:22:31PM +0000, Alex Hayward wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 11:03:26PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> > >
> > > So its really all about accounting, in a sense - whether pages end up in
> > > the 'Buf' or 'Inactive' queue, they are still cached!
> >
> > So what's the difference between Buf and Active then? Just that active
> > means it's a code page, or that it's been directly mapped into a
> > processes memory (perhaps via mmap)?
> 
> I don't think that Buf and Active are mutually exclusive. Try adding up
> Active, Inactive, Cache, Wired, Buf and Free - it'll come to more than
> your physical memory.
> 
> Active gives an amount of physical memory. Buf gives an amount of
> kernel-space virtual memory which provide the kernel with a window on to
> pages in the other categories. In fact, I don't think that 'Buf' really
> belongs in the list as it doesn't represent a 'type' of page at all.

Ahhh, I get it... a KVM (what's that stand for anyway?) is required any
time the kernel wants to access a page that doesn't belong to it, right?

And actually, I just checked 4 machines and adding all the queues plus
buf together didn't add up to total memory except on one of them (there
adding just the queues came close; 1507.6MB on a 1.5GB machine).
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461



view thread (46+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20060321123417.GW15742@pervasive.com>
Permalink:  ../20060321123417.GW15742@pervasive.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20060321123417.GW15742@pervasive.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jnasby@pervasive.com, xelah-pgsql@xelah.com, markir@paradise.net.nz, vivek@khera.org
  Subject: Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adaptec
  In-Reply-To: <20060321123417.GW15742@pervasive.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox