From: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Scott Sipe <cscotts@mindspring.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Super-smack?
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:36:44 -0500
Message-ID: <20060502203643.GD97354@pervasive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060501115449.GC11061@uio.no>
References: <92F10BE1-B193-4EEA-877A-9260B55C2844@mindspring.com>
<20060501115449.GC11061@uio.no>
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:54:49PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:05:54AM -0500, Scott Sipe wrote:
> > So, my question is, before I do any further digging, is super-smack
> > flawed?
>
> It's sort of hard to say without looking at the source -- it certainly isn't
> a benchmark I've heard of before, and it's also sort of hard to believe a
> benchmark whose focus seems to be so thoroughly on one database (MySQL). The
> site claims (about PostgreSQL) support that "it looks like it works";
> certainly not a good start for fair benchmarking :-)
If you want a more realistic test, try dbt2:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/osdldbt
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jnasby@pervasive.com, cscotts@mindspring.com
Subject: Re: Super-smack?
In-Reply-To: <20060502203643.GD97354@pervasive.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox