From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SAN performance mystery
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 06:24:32 -0400
Message-ID: <20060619102430.GD3303@mathom.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <449677EB.50609@proximity.com.au>
References: <4491D61B.9040507@proximity.com.au>
<1150408614.26538.95.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
<449677EB.50609@proximity.com.au>
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:09:47PM +1000, Tim Allen wrote:
>Certainly, the read performance of the SATA disk still beats the SAN,
>and there is no way to lie about read performance.
Sure there is: you have the data cached in system RAM. I find it real
hard to believe that you can sustain 161MB/s off a single SATA disk.
Mike Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mstone+postgres@mathom.us
Subject: Re: SAN performance mystery
In-Reply-To: <20060619102430.GD3303@mathom.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox