pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim C. Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Tobias Brox <tobias@nordicbet.com>
Cc: Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Simple join optimized badly?
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:00:50 -0500
Message-ID: <20061010140050.GZ72517@nasby.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9723.1160433916@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <20061009213303.GA19144@oppetid.no>
	<20061009223030.GW72517@nasby.net>
	<9723.1160433916@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 06:45:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net> writes:
> > One of the big problems with doing set enable_...=off is that there's no
> > way to embed that into something like a view, so you're almost forced
> > into putting into the application code itself, which makes matters even
> > worse. If you could hint this within a query (maybe even on a per-table
> > level), you could at least encapsulate that into a view.
> 
> You've almost reinvented one of the points that was made in the last
> go-round on the subject of hints, which is that keeping them out of the
> application code is an important factor in making them manageable by a
> DBA.  Hints stored in a system catalog (and probably having the form of
> "make this statistical assumption" rather than specifically "use that
> plan") would avoid many of the negatives.

Sure, but IIRC no one's figured out what that would actually look like,
while it's not hard to come up with a syntax that allows you to tell the
optimizer "scan index XYZ to access this table". (And if there's real
interest in adding that I'll come up with a proposal.)

I'd rather have the ugly solution sooner rather than the elegant one
later (if ever).
-- 
Jim Nasby                                            jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)



view thread (56+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20061010140050.GZ72517@nasby.net>
Permalink:  ../20061010140050.GZ72517@nasby.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20061010140050.GZ72517@nasby.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jim@nasby.net, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, tobias@nordicbet.com, cbbrowne@acm.org
  Subject: Re: Simple join optimized badly?
  In-Reply-To: <20061010140050.GZ72517@nasby.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox