pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Bad iostat numbers
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 07:15:09 -0500
Message-ID: <20061205121507.GZ1622@mathom.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33c6269f0612042221x5820e98bl96f8d0dc4a87bd3f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <PEEPKDFEHHEMKBBFPOOKKEHCDKAA.carlos.reimer@opendb.com.br>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0612032336250.19679@westnet.com>
	<33c6269f0612032317t9f0bc77n3ff791a5cd88fc80@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0612041946120.9323@westnet.com>
	<33c6269f0612042221x5820e98bl96f8d0dc4a87bd3f@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 01:21:38AM -0500, Alex Turner wrote:
>My other and most important point is that I can't find any solid
>recommendations for a SCSI card that can perform optimally in Linux or
>*BSD.  Off by a factor of 3x is pretty sad IMHO. (and yes, we know the
>Adaptec cards suck worse, that doesn't bring us to a _good_ card).

This gets back to my point about terminology. As a SCSI HBA the Adaptec 
is decent: I can sustain about 300MB/s off a single channel of the 
39320A using an external RAID controller. As a RAID controller I can't 
even imagine using the Adaptec; I'm fairly certain they put that 
"functionality" on there just so they could charge more for the card. It 
may be that there's not much market for on-board SCSI RAID controllers; 
between SATA on the low end and SAS & FC on the high end, there isn't a
whole lotta space left for SCSI. I definitely don't think much
R&D is going into SCSI controllers any more, compared to other solutions 
like SATA or SAS RAID (the 39320 hasn't change in at least 3 years, 
IIRC). Anyway, since the Adaptec part is a decent SCSI controller and a 
lousy RAID controller, have you tried just using software RAID? 

Mike Stone



view thread (22+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20061205121507.GZ1622@mathom.us>
Permalink:  ../20061205121507.GZ1622@mathom.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20061205121507.GZ1622@mathom.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: mstone+postgres@mathom.us
  Subject: Re: Bad iostat numbers
  In-Reply-To: <20061205121507.GZ1622@mathom.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox