From: Tobias Brox <tobias@nordicbet.com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Tobias Brox <tobias@nordicbet.com>
Cc: Peter Childs <peterachilds@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Planner statistics, correlations
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:44:22 +0100
Message-ID: <20070112104422.GD9703@oppetid.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45A765DE.9020003@enterprisedb.com>
References: <20070112081631.GA10636@oppetid.no>
<a2de01dd0701120056p37f1906excd71068468e5769a@mail.gmail.com>
<20070112090500.GB16243@oppetid.no>
<45A765DE.9020003@enterprisedb.com>
[Heikki Linnakangas - Fri at 10:41:34AM +0000]
> I thought about partitioning the table by state, putting rows with
> state=4 into one partition, and all others to another partition.
That sounds like a good idea - but wouldn't that be costly when changing state?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tobias@nordicbet.com, heikki@enterprisedb.com, peterachilds@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Planner statistics, correlations
In-Reply-To: <20070112104422.GD9703@oppetid.no>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox