From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Dimitri <dimitrik.fr@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Parallel Vacuum
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:52:05 -0400
Message-ID: <20070322135205.GD4102@alvh.no-ip.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703221435.54408.dimitrik.fr@gmail.com>
References: <200703221435.54408.dimitrik.fr@gmail.com>
Dimitri escribió:
> Folks,
>
> is there any constrains/problems/etc. to run several vacuum processes in
> parallel while each one is 'vaccuming' one different table?
No, no problem. Keep in mind that if one of them takes a very long
time, the others will not be able to remove dead tuples that were
killed while the long vacuum was running -- unless you are in 8.2.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@commandprompt.com, dimitrik.fr@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Parallel Vacuum
In-Reply-To: <20070322135205.GD4102@alvh.no-ip.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox