From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: On managerial choosing (was: Postgres VS Oracle)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:45:33 -0400
Message-ID: <20070620194533.GD743@phlogiston.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706201958.03510.ah@hatzis.de>
References: <c50dbb0b0706180855v4b781f13m6e54c50aa3ab1dee@mail.gmail.com>
<603b0odl5i.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com>
<20070620144810.GO31426@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
<200706201958.03510.ah@hatzis.de>
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 07:57:58PM +0200, Anastasios Hatzis wrote:
> focussed and maybe not enthusiastic about too much CIO/CTO flavored
> communication). Actually this kind of communication looks to me like to be
> perfectly done by commercial PG vendors?
Well, sure, but I sort of assume that the -advocacy list has
subscribed to it only people who are interested in promoting
PostgreSQL. So I figure that this group probably needs to think
about the audiences for its output; and C*O people make up one of
them.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.
--Philip Greenspun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: ajs@crankycanuck.ca, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: On managerial choosing (was: Postgres VS Oracle)
In-Reply-To: <20070620194533.GD743@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox