pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anastasios Hatzis <ah@hatzis.de>
To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: On managerial choosing (was: Postgres VS Oracle)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:57:58 +0200
Message-ID: <200706201958.03510.ah@hatzis.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070620144810.GO31426@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
References: <c50dbb0b0706180855v4b781f13m6e54c50aa3ab1dee@mail.gmail.com>
	<603b0odl5i.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com>
	<20070620144810.GO31426@phlogiston.dyndns.org>

On Wednesday 20 June 2007, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 11:22:17AM -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
> > In cases where you *do not* spend the BPOM, there is not any
> > particular evidence available to indicate that Oracle is, in any
> > interesting way, more reliable than PostgreSQL.
>
> I hate to say this, but as true as the above is, it has very close to
> zero relevance to the way most senior managers make decisions.

[...]

I also hate to say this, but I fully agree with whatever you wrote in this 
mail.

[...]

> much money you have to spend, and how risky it would be to tie that
> up in Oracle licenses.  In some cases, that turns out to be too risky,
> and Postgres becomes a viable choice.  It's only exceptionally
> visionary senior managers who operate in other ways.

Yes, maybe 10 out of 100. Likely less.

[...]
> addicted to the excellent features of PostgreSQL, though.  The second
> is that marketing to management by using arguments, listing lots of
> technical detail and features, and the like, will never work.
> They'll ignore such cluttered and crowded brochures, because they
> don't deal in technical detail.  We have to make PostgreSQL a
> low-risk choice for them.

I wonder if this is something which really is a job of the core team or 
community (I think of the 'traditional' PG users who are more technically 
focussed and maybe not enthusiastic about too much CIO/CTO flavored 
communication). Actually this kind of communication looks to me like to be 
perfectly done by commercial PG vendors?

Anastasios

view thread (3+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <200706201958.03510.ah@hatzis.de>
Permalink:  ../200706201958.03510.ah@hatzis.de/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200706201958.03510.ah@hatzis.de

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: ah@hatzis.de, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: On managerial choosing (was: Postgres VS Oracle)
  In-Reply-To: <200706201958.03510.ah@hatzis.de>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox