From: Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:07:23 +0200
Message-ID: <200707251507.23951.mweilguni@sime.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1185367933.4146.13.camel@ebony.site>
References: <73185727-AD4A-4C97-B243-ADD2EE1875B5@decibel.org>
<46A0EAE3.7030305@agliodbs.com>
<1185367933.4146.13.camel@ebony.site>
Am Mittwoch 25 Juli 2007 schrieb Simon Riggs:
> I have reasonable evidence that Referential Integrity is the major
> performance bottleneck and would like some objective evidence that this
> is the case.
Just curious, will 8.3 still check FK constraints (and use locks) even if the
referencing column value does not change?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mweilguni@sime.com, simon@2ndquadrant.com, josh@agliodbs.com, decibel@decibel.org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
In-Reply-To: <200707251507.23951.mweilguni@sime.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox