pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
Cc: Kevin Kempter <kevin@kevinkempterllc.com>
Cc: Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: significant vacuum issues - looking for suggestions
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:04:39 -0500
Message-ID: <20070827220438.GR54309@nasby.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46D30240.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov>
References: <200708241357.23629.kevin@kevinkempterllc.com>
	<20070824164144.93ce05bf.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
	<20070827210041.GN54309@nasby.net>
	<46D30240.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov>

On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 04:56:33PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> >>> Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org> 08/27/07 4:00 PM >>> 
> > > > They're running  version 8.1.4
> > 
> > As for your pg_dump idea... why not just do a CREATE TABLE AS SELECT *
> > FROM bloated_table? That would likely be much faster than messing around
> > with pg_dump.
>  
> He wanted to upgrade to 8.2.4.  CREATE TABLE AS won't get him there.
>  
> > > > They're running  version 8.1.4 on 4-way dell boxes 
> > > > with 4Gig of memory on each box attached to RAID-10 disk arrays. 
> > 
> > What kind of disk hardware is this running on? A good raid 10 array with
> > write caching should be able to handle a 200G database fairly well
>  
> What other details were you looking for?

How many drives? Write caching? 200G isn't *that* big for good drive
hardware, *IF* it's performing the way it should. You'd be surprised how
many arrays fall on their face even from a simple dd test.
-- 
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby                        decibel@decibel.org
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)

view thread (12+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20070827220438.GR54309@nasby.net>
Permalink:  ../20070827220438.GR54309@nasby.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20070827220438.GR54309@nasby.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: decibel@decibel.org, Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov, wmoran@collaborativefusion.com, kevin@kevinkempterllc.com
  Subject: Re: significant vacuum issues - looking for suggestions
  In-Reply-To: <20070827220438.GR54309@nasby.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox