From: Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 14:04:54 -0500
Message-ID: <20071109140454.924e94b1.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0711091107590.29551@westnet.com>
References: <47344D43.5090506@geri.cc.fer.hr>
<47347F9F.1070309@laliluna.de>
<Pine.GSO.4.64.0711091107590.29551@westnet.com>
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 11:11:18 -0500 (EST)
Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Sebastian Hennebrueder wrote:
>
> > If the queries are complex, this is understable.
>
> The queries used for this comparison are trivial. There's only one table
> involved and there are no joins. It's testing very low-level aspects of
> performance.
Actually, what it's really showing is parallelism, and I've always
expected PostgreSQL to come out on top in that arena.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: wmoran@collaborativefusion.com, gsmith@gregsmith.com
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD
In-Reply-To: <20071109140454.924e94b1.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox