pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Dual core Opterons beating quad core Xeons?
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:02:57 -0800
Message-ID: <20071219120257.32d1fc50@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fkbqho$1jsp$1@news.hub.org>
References: <476908BB.5090408@stuartbishop.net>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0712191322410.29296@westnet.com>
	<20071219105921.07b45a36@commandprompt.com>
	<fkbqho$1jsp$1@news.hub.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:14:08 -0800
Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com> wrote:

> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Actually this is not true. Although I have yet to test 8.3. It is
> > pretty much common knowledge that after 8 cores the acceleration of
> > performance drops with PostgreSQL...
> > 
> > This has gotten better every release. 8.1 for example handles 8
> > cores very well, 8.0 didn't and 7.4 well.... :)
> 
> I agree with the spirit of what you say, but are you overstating
> things a bit?

My point was :)... which that PDF actually illustrates is the gain
between say 2 cores and 8 cores is greater than 8 and 16 and even
less when you go beyond 16.

> 
> Benchmarks I see[1] suggest that 8.1.2 scaled pretty reasonably to 16
> cores (from the chart on page 9 in the link below).  But yeah, 8.0
> scaled to maybe 2 cores if you're lucky. :-)

I really need to check this test out more though because their numbers
don't reflect mine. I wonder if that is per connection.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake
- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFHaXjxATb/zqfZUUQRAhlyAJijNIytenaBH2c5mEivFCT4qRmPAKCiW7Qn
2CDwNUBNd463Kz7G6n68yA==
=bnaL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


view thread (17+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20071219120257.32d1fc50@commandprompt.com>
Permalink:  ../20071219120257.32d1fc50@commandprompt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20071219120257.32d1fc50@commandprompt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com
  Subject: Re: Dual core Opterons beating quad core Xeons?
  In-Reply-To: <20071219120257.32d1fc50@commandprompt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox