pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: How to allocate 8 disks
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 13:03:47 -0800
Message-ID: <20080301130347.0832b323@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47C99B3E.4010606@emolecules.com>
References: <1204285894.11773.33.camel@franck-gusty>
	<dcc563d10802290613v482f52dr43ea95b52886de31@mail.gmail.com>
	<1204296705.11773.51.camel@franck-gusty>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0802291019570.28452@westnet.com>
	<47C88826.4040209@paradise.net.nz>
	<47C99B3E.4010606@emolecules.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:06:54 -0800
Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com> wrote:

> We're upgrading to a medium-sized server, a Dell PowerEdge 2950,
> dual-quad CPU's and 8 GB memory.  This box can hold at most 8 disks
> (10K SCSI 2.5" 146 GB drives) and has Dell's Perc 6/i RAID controller.
> 
> I'm thinking of this:
> 
>   6 disks  RAID 1+0  Postgres data
>   1 disk   WAL
>   1 disk   Linux
> 
> I've often seen RAID 1 recommended for the WAL.  Is that strictly for
> reliability, or is there a performance advantage to RAID 1 for the
> WAL?
> 
> It seems to me separating the OS and WAL on two disks is better than
> making a single RAID 1 and sharing it, from a performance point of
> view.

This scares me... You lose WAL you are a goner. Combine your OS and
WAL into a RAID 1.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHycSzATb/zqfZUUQRAs14AJ9pm3huW+z1j7jUIY7FbIZMzz2IxgCgnOhD
yWiDabTYAG+x12JEqrf4q8E=
=gBPs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


view thread (14+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20080301130347.0832b323@commandprompt.com>
Permalink:  ../20080301130347.0832b323@commandprompt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20080301130347.0832b323@commandprompt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, craig_james@emolecules.com
  Subject: Re: How to allocate 8 disks
  In-Reply-To: <20080301130347.0832b323@commandprompt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox