pg.ddx.io pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Subject: Re: off-topic: SPAM
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:19:57 -0300 (ADT)
Message-ID: <20080424151704.I41681@fserv.hub.org> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <87prsf6tbk.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com >
References: <D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C202043E32@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at >
<87lk338olw.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com >
<20080424103344.A41681@fserv.hub.org >
<34b60eee0804240754j47c9a020y96e5e57dd28367d8@mail.gmail.com >
<20080424134308.G41681@fserv.hub.org >
<20080424165110.GB15631@alvh.no-ip.org >
<87prsf6tbk.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com >
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
>
>> Marc G. Fournier escribió:
>>>
>>> where are the reports going to? am I missing off a list somewhere?
>>>
>>> of course, your response really didn't enlighten me any ... what is the
>>> problem that is being seen / reported ?
>>
>> The problem is that any time some posts to pgsql-performance he gets a
>> bounce from a postmaster in infotecnica.com.br domain.
>>
>> It has been reported in several lists:
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2007-12/msg00203.php
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-12/msg00697.php
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2007-12/msg00126.php
>
> The only way we're going to solve this is to send a personalized email to
> every subscriber of pgsql-performance. We might be able to get away with just
> doing brazilian subscribers first and hope it's one of those.
That would only be 42 email addresses, so not *too* painful, but if their
email requires a 'challenge-response' to send to them, how did they get
subscribed in the first place, as our subscribe method is
'challenge-response' also, which means they have to receive the email we
send to them automaticalloy in the first place ...
So, are these a result of forwarding, vs direct subscription?
view thread (17+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <20080424151704.I41681@fserv.hub.org>
Permalink: ../20080424151704.I41681@fserv.hub.org/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/20080424151704.I41681@fserv.hub.org
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: scrappy@hub.org, stark@enterprisedb.com, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org
Subject: Re: off-topic: SPAM
In-Reply-To: <20080424151704.I41681@fserv.hub.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox