From: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@simkin.ca>
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Annoying Reply-To
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:12:51 -0700
Message-ID: <200810231112.51595@hal.medialogik.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4900B39B.2040508@kkmfg.com>
References: <200810231701.m9NH1ML21995@momjian.us>
<4900B39B.2040508@kkmfg.com>
On Thursday 23 October 2008, Collin Kidder <adderd@kkmfg.com> wrote:
> You must use Reply All. You
> might say that that makes Thunderbird crippled but I see it more as a
> sign that nobody outside of a few fussy RFC worshipping types would ever
> want the behavior of the Postgre list. Yes, I'll have to live with the
> current behavior. Yes, it's an RFC standard. But, even after having
> heard the arguments I'm not convinced that this list's behavior is
> desirable. YMMV.
If it bugs you that much, just fix it for yourself.
:0 fr
* ^(To:|Cc:).*pgsql-general@postgresql.org.*
| /usr/bin/formail -I "Reply-To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org"
.. and eliminate any dupes:
:0 Whc: /home/$USER/.msgid.lock
|/usr/bin/formail -D 1024 /home/$USER/.msgid.cache
If your MUA doesn't work right, procmail is your friend.
--
Alan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: ahodgson@simkin.ca, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Annoying Reply-To
In-Reply-To: <200810231112.51595@hal.medialogik.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox