pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Max Williams <max.williams@mflow.com>
Cc: lacey.powers@commandprompt.com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Subject: Re: Command Prompt 8.4.4 PRMs compiled with debug/assert enabled
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:14:27 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <201006141114.o5EBERC02420@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201006132357.o5DNvdi18873@momjian.us>

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue jun 10 11:46:25 -0400 2010:
> > > > 
> > > > > Yes, the folks at commandprompt need to be told about this.  Loudly.
> > > > > It's a serious packaging error.
> > > > 
> > > > Just notified Lacey, the packager (not so loudly, though); she's working
> > > > on new packages, and apologizes for the inconvenience.
> > > 
> > > [ Thread moved to hackers.  8.4.4 RPMs were built with debug flags. ]
> > > 
> > > Uh, where are we on this?  Has it been completed?  How are people
> > > informed about this?  Do we need to post to the announce email list? 
> > > Does Yum just update them?  How did this mistake happen?  How many days
> > > did it take to detect the problem?
> > > 
> > > Why has no news been posted here?
> > > 
> > > 	https://public.commandprompt.com/projects/pgcore/news
> > 
> > Why have I received no reply to this email?  Do people think this is not
> > a serious issue?  I know it is a weekend but the problem was identified
> > on Thursday, meaning there was a full workday for someone from
> > CommandPrompt to reply to the issue and report a status:
> > 
> > 	http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-06/msg00165.php
> 
> [ Updated subject line.]
> 
> I am on IM with Joshua Drake right now and am working to get answers to
> the questions above.  He or I will report in the next few hours.
> 
> FYI, only Command Prompt-produced RPMs are affected.  Devrim's RPMs are
> not:
> 
> 	http://yum.postgresqlrpms.org/

I have still seen no public report about this, 12 hours after talking to
Josh Drake on IM about it.  :-(

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + None of us is going to be here forever. +



view thread (11+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <201006141114.o5EBERC02420@momjian.us>
Permalink:  ../201006141114.o5EBERC02420@momjian.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/201006141114.o5EBERC02420@momjian.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: bruce@momjian.us, alvherre@commandprompt.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, max.williams@mflow.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, jd@commandprompt.com
  Subject: Re: Command Prompt 8.4.4 PRMs compiled with debug/assert enabled
  In-Reply-To: <201006141114.o5EBERC02420@momjian.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox