From: gnuoytr@rcn.com
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 19:03:22 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <201104062303.060548@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <312218.14775.qm@web111305.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References: <C9C21E99.2E925%scott@richrelevance.com>
<312218.14775.qm@web111305.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Not for user data, only controller data.
---- Original message ----
>Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
>From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org (on behalf of Andy <angelflow@yahoo.com>)
>Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Intel SSDs that may not suck
>To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>,Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
>Cc: "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>,Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
>
>
>--- On Wed, 4/6/11, Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com> wrote:
>
>
>> I could care less about the 'fast' sandforce drives.
>> They fail at a high
>> rate and the performance improvement is BECAUSE they are
>> using a large,
>> volatile write cache.
>
>The G1 and G2 Intel MLC also use volatile write cache, just like most SandForce drives do.
>
>--
>Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
>To make changes to your subscription:
>http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: gnuoytr@rcn.com
Subject: Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
In-Reply-To: <201104062303.060548@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox