From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Subject: Re: Bloom index cost model seems to be wrong
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 16:00:12 +0900
Message-ID: <20190926070012.GC2448@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190925201226.GA23098@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20591.1551378611@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20190925201226.GA23098@alvherre.pgsql>
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 05:12:26PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> It's not clear to me what the next action should be on this patch. I
> think Jeff got some feedback from Tom, but was that enough to expect a
> new version to be posted? That was in February; should we now (in late
> September) close this as Returned with Feedback?
That sounds rather right to me.
--
Michael
Attachments:
[application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (832B, ../20190926070012.GC2448@paquier.xyz/2-signature.asc)
download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, jeff.janes@gmail.com, spam_eater@gmx.net, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, teodor@sigaev.ru, a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru
Subject: Re: Bloom index cost model seems to be wrong
In-Reply-To: <20190926070012.GC2448@paquier.xyz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox