From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Hans Braxmeier <hans.braxmeier@outlook.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Postgres 9.5 / 9.6: Restoring PG 9.4 dump is very very slow
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 19:40:58 -0400
Message-ID: <20571.1492213258@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB11364C57DD1FA57A376F4E1B99050@VI1PR04MB1136.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <VI1PR04MB11364C57DD1FA57A376F4E1B99050@VI1PR04MB1136.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
Hans Braxmeier <hans.braxmeier@outlook.com> writes:
> Restoring these dumps in PG 9.4 takes less than 20 minutes, restoring them in PG 9.5/9.5 takes several hours on the same system (even if I make a PG 9.5/9.6 dumps and try to restore this one)!
Can you provide a test case demonstrating this sort of slowdown?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, hans.braxmeier@outlook.com
Subject: Re: Postgres 9.5 / 9.6: Restoring PG 9.4 dump is very very slow
In-Reply-To: <20571.1492213258@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox