From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
Cc: Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgres Benchmark Results
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 13:26:38 -0400
Message-ID: <2438.1179681998@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.tsmxycgdcigqcu@apollo13>
References: <op.tsmrv71ecigqcu@apollo13>
<46507A40.505@tweakers.net>
<op.tsmxycgdcigqcu@apollo13>
PFC <lists@peufeu.com> writes:
> The little curve that dives into the ground is MySQL with InnoDB.
> The Energizer bunny that keeps going is Postgres.
Just for comparison's sake it would be interesting to see a curve for
mysql/myisam. Mysql's claim to speed is mostly based on measurements
taken with myisam tables, but I think that doesn't hold up very well
under concurrent load.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, lists@peufeu.com, acmmailing@tweakers.net
Subject: Re: Postgres Benchmark Results
In-Reply-To: <2438.1179681998@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox