From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Marc Morin <marc@sandvine.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: partitioning and locking problems
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:49:43 -0500
Message-ID: <25857.1138772983@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2BCEB9A37A4D354AA276774EE13FB8C263B3DE@mailserver.sandvine.com>
References: <2BCEB9A37A4D354AA276774EE13FB8C263B3DE@mailserver.sandvine.com>
"Marc Morin" <marc@sandvine.com> writes:
> Would like to understand the implications of changing postgres'
> code/locking for rule changes and truncate to not require locking out
> select statements?
It won't work...
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, marc@sandvine.com
Subject: Re: partitioning and locking problems
In-Reply-To: <25857.1138772983@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox