From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Fredrik Olsson <fredrik.olsson@treyst.se>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Force another plan.
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:01:46 -0500
Message-ID: <25933.1140447706@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43F992D1.6040308@treyst.se>
References: <43F74592.7010701@treyst.se>
<20490.1140287811@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<43F866E2.20001@treyst.se>
<11673.1140370277@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<43F992D1.6040308@treyst.se>
Fredrik Olsson <fredrik.olsson@treyst.se> writes:
> Is a self contained test-case for the old way with the "proxy-view" is
> still wanted?
Yes, something still seems funny there. And for that matter it wasn't
clear what was wrong with your proxy view, either.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, fredrik.olsson@treyst.se
Subject: Re: Force another plan.
In-Reply-To: <25933.1140447706@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox