From: Sean Davis <sdavis2@mail.nih.gov>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [OT] RAID controllers blocking one another?
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:35:15 -0500
Message-ID: <264855a00801181135p693e4ceek7c4b2f506ca21e80@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0801181400110.19036@westnet.com>
References: <264855a00801171217m4e6211e6y5f4d0e12ce86db5c@mail.gmail.com>
<dcc563d10801171307p4869b0ayc27c3433c19455ba@mail.gmail.com>
<Pine.GSO.4.64.0801171807060.18514@westnet.com>
<264855a00801180503k14910362p3165b46e8450d045@mail.gmail.com>
<Pine.GSO.4.64.0801181400110.19036@westnet.com>
On Jan 18, 2008 2:14 PM, Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Sean Davis wrote:
>
> > FYI, here are the specs on the server.
> > http://www.thinkmate.com/System/8U_Dual_Xeon_i2SS40-8U_Storage_Server
>
> Now we're getting somewhere. I'll dump this on-list as it's a good
> example of how to fight this class of performance problems.
>
> The usual troubleshooting procedure is to figure out how the motherboard
> is mapping all the I/O internally and then try to move things out of the
> same path. That tells us that you have an Intel S5000PSL motherboard, and
> the tech specs are at
>
> http://support.intel.com/support/motherboards/server/s5000psl/sb/CS-022619.htm
>
> What you want to stare at is the block diagram that's Figure 10, page 27
> (usually this isn't in the motherboard documentation, and instead you have
> to drill down into the chipset documentation to find it). Slots 5 and 6
> that have PCI Express x16 connectors (but run at x8 speed) both go
> straight into the memory hub. Slots 3 and 4, which are x8 but run at x4
> speed, go through the I/O controller first. Those should be slower, so if
> you put a card into there it will have a degraded top-end performance
> compared to slots 5/6.
>
> Line that up with the layout in Figure 2, page 17, and you should be able
> to get an idea what the possibilities are for moving the cards around and
> what the trade-offs involved are. Ideally you'd want both 3Ware cards to
> be in slots 5+6, but if that's your current configuration you could try
> moving the less important of the two (maybe the one with less drives) to
> either slot 3/4 and see if the contention you're seeing drops.
>
Greg, this is GREAT information and I'm glad you stepped through the
process. It is really interesting to see to what extent these slots that
have similar names (or the same names) should be expected to behave so
differently. We'll try some of the things you suggest (although it will
probably take a while to do) and if we come to any conclusions will let
everyone know our conclusions.
Sean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sdavis2@mail.nih.gov, gsmith@gregsmith.com
Subject: Re: [OT] RAID controllers blocking one another?
In-Reply-To: <264855a00801181135p693e4ceek7c4b2f506ca21e80@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox