From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:27:14 +0000
Message-ID: <2f4958ff1003020827o76dfd233mbd0602093eb65c4a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17546.1267546998@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <201002252346.o1PNkXG07892@momjian.us>
<9477.1267142614@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<603c8f071003020816j77b3ec63wbad0415df003c0f1@mail.gmail.com>
<17546.1267546998@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> Partially. There are stats now but autovacuum is not bright about
> >> when to update them.
>
> > Is that something you're planning to fix for 9.0? If not, we at least
> > need to document what we intend for people to do about it.
>
> I want to look at it, but I'm not sure whether the fix will be small
> enough that we want to put it in during beta.
>
> I am pretty sure many people will appreciate it, even if it isn't going to
be small.
Is that stat collection across child tables any useful by it self ?
--
GJ
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: gryzman@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, robertmhaas@gmail.com, bruce@momjian.us, books@ejurka.com
Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?
In-Reply-To: <2f4958ff1003020827o76dfd233mbd0602093eb65c4a@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox