From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Matthew T. O'Connor <matthew@zeut.net>
Cc: Robert Creager <Robert_Creager@LogicalChaos.org>
Cc: PGPerformance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Cc: Andy Hewitt <Andy_Hewitt@StorageTek.com>
Subject: Re: Huge performance problem between 7.4.1 and 8.0.3 -
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 10:53:04 -0400
Message-ID: <3283.1121698384@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42DBBD4A.6030209@zeut.net>
References: <20050717213416.59dcb52e@thunder.logicalchaos.org>
<24520.1121659853@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20050717235630.26a7c979@thunder.logicalchaos.org>
<2466.1121692991@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<42DBBD4A.6030209@zeut.net>
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net> writes:
> Therefore (if you aren't specifying them from the command line), on 803,
> the vacuum delay settings should be the same for a cron issued vacuum
> and an autovacuum issued vacuum. So if the vacuum delay settings are
> the problem, then it should show up either way.
... as indeed it does according to Robert's recent reports. Still
awaiting the definitive test, but I'm starting to think this is another
case of the strange behavior Ian Westmacott exhibited.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, matthew@zeut.net, Robert_Creager@LogicalChaos.org, Andy_Hewitt@StorageTek.com
Subject: Re: Huge performance problem between 7.4.1 and 8.0.3 -
In-Reply-To: <3283.1121698384@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox