pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Turner <armtuk@gmail.com>
To: PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>
Cc: John A Meinel <john@arbash-meinel.com>
Cc: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Cheap RAM disk?
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:10:11 -0400
Message-ID: <33c6269f0507261210400dff27@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.sui82lnith1vuj@localhost>
References: <42E6661D.3060304@arbash-meinel.com>
	<op.sui82lnith1vuj@localhost>

Please see:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820145309
and
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820145416

The price of Reg ECC is not significantly higher than regular ram at
this point.  Plus if you go with super fast 2-2-2-6 then it's actualy
more than good ol 2.5 Reg ECC.

Alex Turner
NetEconomist

On 7/26/05, PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com> wrote:
> 
> > I'm a little leary as it is definitely a version 1.0 product (it is
> > still using an FPGA as the controller, so they were obviously pushing to
> > get the card into production).
> 
>         Not necessarily. FPGA's have become a sensible choice now. My RME studio
> soundcard uses a big FPGA.
> 
>         The performance in the test doesn't look that good, though, but don't
> forget it was run under windows. For instance they get 77s to copy the
> Firefox source tree on their Athlon 64/raptor ; my Duron / 7200rpm ide
> drive does it in 30 seconds, but not with windows of course.
> 
>         However it doesnt' use ECC so... That's a pity, because they could have
> implemented ECC in "software" inside the chip, and have the benefits of
> error correction with normal, cheap RAM.
> 
>         Well; wait and see...
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>



view thread (13+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <33c6269f0507261210400dff27@mail.gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../33c6269f0507261210400dff27@mail.gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/33c6269f0507261210400dff27@mail.gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: armtuk@gmail.com, lists@boutiquenumerique.com, john@arbash-meinel.com
  Subject: Re: Cheap RAM disk?
  In-Reply-To: <33c6269f0507261210400dff27@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox